--- Matt Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
Hate it.
As in "isch, I donst tsink so?"
It's not obvious to the naive reader.
Nor is the disorganised current system, or the edit link for that matter, depending on how you define naieve.
The link is out of the body of the article, and people are already well-trained by numerous websites to ignore content outside the central box.
Do you have a source for that?
The word 'Disambiguation' itself is Wikipedia jargon; it isn't obvious that it means 'If you wanted another meaning of this term, go here'.
Hm. So edit this page" and "what links here" are common jargon? On the one hand you say 'it has to be in the content, because people dont look elsewhere.' Not the most compelling argument. On the other hand you say 'its special wiki terminology, though it doesnt belong with other special wiki terminology:' Recent changes, What links here, Related changes, Special pages...
Sigh.
-sv PS: Does adding actual fact content to Uncyclopedia constitute "trolling"?
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com