Ken Arromdee wrote:
When they say that Wikipedia's proces for fixing articles is "opaque, time-consuming and cumbersome", they are *correct*.
Well, yeah, but. Right (sorta) conclusion, wrong reason.
It can always be improved, but I don't think our "process" for fixing articles is *that* bad. And, in any case, it wasn't at all so cumbersome that it kept Finsbury from whitewashing the article!