On 15/06/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
Well, we routinely dump frivolous ones...
Sure, but I wasn't talking about "frivolous ones". Rather, I was thinking of one in particular which contains such libel as "Anthony is a troll if there ever was one" and "I find Anthony a bit disturbed, to say the least". It's really fun to have that as the second Google hit for one's name.
I don't see any particular conceptual reason we shouldn't do something like this for RFArs - perhaps consigning all the discussion to history and then leaving only the "ruling" visible without bouncing back to the second-newest revision - but I also don't care enough to start trying to implement it against a thousand screams of "censorship!" :-)