On Apr 8, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
- elements of erotica,
- and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify those inclusions.
We don't need to make a policy because of this single specific case, because we're not deluged by child pornography. If this case recurs, then we can deal with it the same way we dealt with this one. When mass uploads of child porn take place, then and only then should we develop policy.