On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 04:35:44 -0800, "Matthew Brown" morven@gmail.com wrote:
I'd guess a good plan to source such a list would be to find an authoritative source - e.g. a trade journal - listing publications that cater to this market. One could then define the list as being 'models who have appeared in publications classified as 'big bust' in Adult Industry Journal', or something like that. Of course, equivalents would have to be found in other worldwide markets, but I would imagine that similar things can be found elsewhere.
That would be perfectly acceptable. What we had was a group of editors getting together to decide that these women had big tits, then, on being challenged, deciding on an arbitrary definition of big based on what they thought was big, and then using the invariably unreliable self-reported data from the women themselves to judge inclusion. That is problematic on many levels.
Guy (JzG)