On 6/7/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
Sure. An article on "things which have been referred to as foo" has no place on Wikipedia. For any thing which may potentially be described as foo, there will be at least one person somewhere who will have so described it. So this should be the list of groups considered cults, with selection criteria set appropriately, or it should be deleted in favour of a category, so that every entry is rigorously tested by individual article authors (which will end up in the usual "pseudoscience" arguments, but that's a matter for consensus building on the articles).
Making it a category would be an absolutely horrible solution, as it would remove any possibility of having any footnotes or annotations.