On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 06:20:58PM -0400, Steve Summit wrote:
I can't begin to untangle all the rhetorical questions, strawmen, and sarcastic remarks here, but: the point is that, for the current issue at least, there *is* a de facto ban on links to slashdot. All sorts of random editors, at least some of them presumably innocent and well-meaning, are asking questions about the Slashdot story, and those questions are being methodically removed without a trace.
"those questions are being methodically removed without a trace" -- oh, really? How is that "without a trace" being implemented? Oversight?
Or is your statement just another part of "all the rhetorical questions, strawmen, and sarcastic remarks here"?