On Feb 19, 2007, at 12:52 PM, K P wrote:
What's great in Wikipedia is due to the huge variety of anybodies, not the small exclusive group of admins, and creating a body of administrators who are so incredibly like-minded, which is what the current RfA process and the big deal about adminship create, is not conducive in the long run to making Wikipedia a place where anybody can edit.
I am really not following... Can you please elaborate on the contradiction you see between having a body of administrators and having an encyclopedia that anyone can edit?
Can you give concrete examples of admins being "overtly hostile to part-time editors"? And if you can produce such examples, are these the exception, or the rule?
-- Jossi