Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 4/25/07, Jeff Raymond jeff.raymond@internationalhouseofbacon.com wrote:
Best-case scenario is yes, merge. Obviously, a "criticism of GWB" article that may exist is going to have difficulty being merged when the main article is already 70kb long, but there's no reason not to take this on a case by case basis, assuming good sourcing.
Why is "criticisms of Uri Geller" (or whoever) a valid encyclopedic subject? Would we accept an article called "instances of undiluted praise of Uri Geller"?
I don't know, would we? Criticism of cranks is a very valid topic and very accepted situation in society.
We're supposed to adopt the neutral point of view, so it would be "evaluations of X".
It's not difficult to be neutral about a subject, even if that subject is inherently negative.
-Jeff