On 7/21/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
We say a good deal more than that. Have you looked at the doping allegations section? It's rapidly coming to dominate the article.
That section needs a good rearrange. It begins well, by establishing that Armstrong has never failed a test despite being one of the most tested athletes ever. However then it goes into 'allegation mode', essentially giving a list of the allegations made against Armstrong at various times.
The section would be better, IMO, by cutting some of the less important or most unreliable allegations (the whole last paragraph, for example, is very shady) and make the descriptions of how he was cleared every time clearer.
Unfortunately it's bed time, so someone else will have to edit if they want to :)