Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:This, too, accords with my reading of the situation. It was this tendentious editing, not sock confusions resulting from the username issues, which resulted in the block. Guy (JzG)
This is getting away from my question of how to resolve checkuser errors. Nonetheless, here's a response.
Tendentious by definition is POV pushing. POV pushing on Wikipedia is pushing an opinion that is inconsistent with what verifiable sources provide. However, my edits were all based on the overwhelming majority of sources (i.e., reputable and reliable). The list the main contributors to the article (of which I remain one despite my now nearly 3 week block) compiled: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abortion/Archive_18#Medical.2C_Reliable.2C... Compare those with an example of my edit to the current, unsourced version: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion&diff=46469735&old...
I was also the first to put up an RFC regarding the abortion article's introductory paragraph: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2... As a result, I'm finding it difficult to see how my edits qualify as tendentious.
--------------------------------- Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2ยข/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.