Well, I just voted 'yes', because I think the rule is excellent.
As usual, I'll engage in a few more days of annoying thought about the matter before making any sort of proclamation linking this rule to short-term bans.
--Jimbo
Daniel Mayer wrote:
Erik wrote:
He is needed to allow us instant tempbans in case this particular policy is violated, which I think would be a useful option to have. There is almost no ambiguity in edit wars.
What punishment to invoke is a separate matter from the policy - yes. But we need to establish the policy first before we can punish people for violating it. There are now 30 in favor and 8 against the rule = 79% in favor. Assuming nobody votes against it, we still need two more votes in favor of the rule to reach 80%.
But a policy without teeth is a bit useless. I agree.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:How_to_revert_a_page_to_an_earli...
-- mav
Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l