On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:19 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/23 WJhonson@aol.com:
In this case, there are two pages (yes just two) of "biography" if you will, and *six* pages of this nonsense. That's just a tad overweight I think we can all agree on that point.
The solution is to add more bio, not to cut the land holdings.
There might not *be* any more bio. Sometimes you can only have stub biographies, which torpedoes Will's argument to do a biography by the numbers, with carefully weighted sections. Personally, a stub bio and a link to a list of his holdings would have been sufficient for me, but the way it has been done is OK as well.
Carcharoth