On 15/11/2007, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
geni wrote: I can't vouch for what was said in the papers, but if there was an actual conviction that information is publicly available from the court registry.
There is a need to distinguish between suppression based on public availability, and suppression based on Wikipedia's own policies.
Ec
No one appears to be denying the the case happened. The debate is was it the same person. According to the New Zealand Press Association it appears we are not the first to ask that and the New Zealand authorities were in a position to get an answer:
http://nz.news.yahoo.com/071030/3/287t.html