I am having some problems with User:Dietary Fiber, on the Idolatry article. He started off by repeatedly criticising the article for pushing a religious point of view (which it clearly did not do). He then went off-topic in the TALK page for this article, so I moved the off-topic part of this discussion over to his own home page so we could discuss things there; that is Wikipedia protocol. In response, he deleted the discussion and labelled it as SPAM, and went back to attacking me! This is a classic behavior of a troll, if not the very definition of one.
He all of my attempts to dialogue, and fabricated a quote from me, and then attacked the position in this quote. Despite how angry I was at this, I tried again to clarify the issues that he seemed to be confused on. In the end, he responded by creating another fake position, and criticised me for things I never said, and beliefs that I never have had.
His most recent slander is this:
Is it appropriate to refer to all idol "worshipers" as idolators, as RK suggests elsewhere? [[User:Dietary Fiber|Dietary Fiber]]
I never wrote any such thing. In fact, I was the one who contributed material to this article, and to the article on Religious pluralism, on why so many liberal Christians and liberal Jews now have the OPPOSITE beliefs. But Dietary Fiber just doesn't care. He is attacking positions I do not have, claiming that I am pushing these positions in the article, and then criticising me for those beliefs!
I don't know what he is up to, but I smell a troll. I would keep a close watch on him.
In frustration,
Robert (RK)
===== "I prefer a wicked person who knows he is wicked, to a righteous person who knows he is righteous". The Seer of Lublin [Jacob Isaac Ha-Hozeh Mi-Lublin, 1745-1815]
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com