On May 11, 2004, at 6:52 AM, Daniel P.B.Smith wrote:
Here's what I want to know. Is this an example of a difficult, carefully-threshed-out consensus that newer Wikipedians, having not participated in that consensus, may be unaware of?
Difficult, yes. Carefully-threshed-out, sort of. Consensus, no. At least I never heard a definitive one. However, I was left with the impression that prescriptive material doesn't belong in the Wikipedia, but can often be reworded to be descriptive. The conversion process seems to weed out the POV. But, no, that's not really a consensus, and that's why it's not in the policy.
Peter
-- ---<>--- -- A house without walls cannot fall. Help build the world's largest encyclopedia at Wikipedia.org -- ---<>--- --