Akash Mehta wrote:
On 9/10/06, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
Indeed. Any process that results in a group nomination of 61 articles and allows both group votes and individual voting on each specific article like this is a horrendous mess. What sense can possibly be made of all the "keep most" and "delete most" votes?
Absolutely. Each article should have some form of individual entry with a quick method of voting for or against, and an overall comments section at the bottom. Then again, the whole deletion review principle appears to serve an insignificant and problematic need. Maybe a MfD?
... of DRV? Excellent idea.
PS. I've never been too fond of the name "Deletion review" - sounds like some sort of revisionist history/slander site...