In my never-humble opinion, this is dangerously close to trolling.
It's intellectually dishonest to take what Anthere said: "I know it is misleading, I am not so happy with that either." and then portray that as her approving a financial that she didn't understand.
She clearly understood it enough to have an objection to the way it was grouped. That doesn't mean she is obliged to vote down the entire financial because she doesn't like the way ONE line item is rolled up.
You owe her an apology. You seriously mis-stated what it is that Anthere said.
I repeat my premise: Anthony, your argument is intellectually dishonest, and thus on shaky ground.
Philippe
-------------------------------------------------- From: "Anthony" wikimail@inbox.org Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:58 PM To: "English Wikipedia" wikien-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Foundation audit
That's all fine and well, but if she receives advice from someone and is happy with their explanation, then she shouldn't later say she isn't happy with it and that it's misleading.
I don't have a problem with the statement. I have a problem with someone voting to approve a statement that they don't understand.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l