--- Mark Richards marich712000@yahoo.com wrote:
Well, if it's strictly for version 1, then fine,
Wonderful. :)
but I really don't see why a group of 'experts' would make for a more reliable article, it seems that it would simply add the standard predjudices that these groups bring.
I never said that. My idea for a review would have seats for both experts and non-experts who are interested in the subject area. Experts would have the *exact* same power to veto labeling an article 1.0 as the non-experts on the board.
The current process of everyone being able to review seems to be better. For sure, eternal vigilence is needed.
Yes - and we should leverage that in a way that satisfies valid criticism and gives us better confidence in our own product.
-- mav
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com