On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Carcharoth carcharothwp@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
I stumbled into this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kinuyo_Yamashit...
My personal summary: Notability requirements shown to be utterly broken for popular culture topics.
Yeah. It's difficult. The discussion looks like a 'no consensus', but throw in the socking accusations and the BLP background, and you can understand the result, even if you disagree with it. I would look up some sources, but I really hate those "pseudonym in another language in an obscure and emerging genre (video music)" cases. You really can't make much progress with those unless someone actually goes and writes a book about it, or you know the other language (and I know no Japanese at all).
Carcharoth
And it doesn't help that composers lend themselves to being indexed in databases and general name-checking without substantive content.
For example, look at the hits for Kinuyo in my CSE: http://www.google.com/cse?cx=009114923999563836576%3A1eorkzz2gp4&q=%22Ki...
Leaving aside the issue that I have no idea whether to whitelist originalsoundversion.com as a RS or blacklist it as a database/blog filling up my results, note that there are tons of references & mentions, but few substantive discussions. (Ironically, one of the more prominent hits is an osv.com post criticizing the deletion: http://www.originalsoundversion.com/?p=7667 )