Rob wrote:
On 2/21/07, Rich Holton wrote:
However, the more I think about the way interactions take place on Wikipedia, the more I am convinced that the asymmetry in power and experience between an admin and a typical editor results in vastly different perspectives on the same actions. What seems (and in fact is) reasonable to an admin or an experienced user, can seem to be (and in fact is) a demonstration of admin "dickism" to a newbie.
This is pretty much the problem. To many newbies, admins represent the power elite, The Man, and not individual volunteers, thus they think nothing of subjecting them to abuse. Any response is seen as an abuse of power, even when the incident is relatively innocuous.
You can't be accused of lacking in self-righteousness, or of not having a flair for the melodramatic.
Ec