The point you seem to miss is that when you BEGIN by attacking people as "trolls" you set the tone for the entire rest of your e-mail. The fact is that the volume of mail that goes through this list is huge, and most of us are very happy to find a reason to reduce the amount that we need to read. Most of the people here are unlikely to have any background in the problem that you have. It may be perfectly valid, but we have no desire to step into the middle of a pissing match. By using the expression "rigged by trolls" as you have, you are just inviting us into that pissing match.
Ec
cu clt wrote:
If you can so readily trust a committee and substitute your judgments with theirs, you might be able save much much more troubles. Powerful lobbies push their case in every election (be it RfA or Arbcom election). Blnguyen has been the lamest addition.
On 6/25/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
cu clt wrote:
I think you have missed serious things. Arbcom case seems to have been rigged by trolls.
Thank you for saying that so early in your e-mail. It saves me the trouble of trying to make sense of the rest.