Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:58:20 -0700, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
If there are no secondary sources I'd say it was unencyclopaedic anyway. Mind you, for my money we'd have a single one-paragraph article on the entire subject of Pokémon...
What makes something encyclopedic is that there are people who want to read about the subject.
Not really. Judging by teh intarwebs most people want to read about reality TV and porn ;-)
For some people Pokémon is reality TV. :-) The Pokémon characters are sufficiently secretive thsat any pornographic interaction between them is unlikely to be verifiable. :-) Ec