Thomas Dalton wrote:
Because it would appear that some people wish to remove all unsourced information. Unfortunately that results in stubs like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cann_Quarry_Canal
That have wikicode that is pretty much impossible for a new editor to comprehend.
I've fixed that article.
The thing I find most amusing is that the article got "fixed" and "unfixed" back and forth several times, repeatedly adding and removing the duplicated references, but in the midst of all that activity nobody bothered to categorize it. There was even a stub template already there to make it easier.
Perhaps some sort of policy allowing the deletion of uncategorized articles would help. :)