On 1/5/06, Ryan Delaney ryan.delaney@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/5/06, Garion1000 garion1000@gmail.com wrote:
Many supreme courts or international courts do work like this though.
They
consist for instance totally of 10 judges but some cases are just taken
up
by three of them. I haven't encountered any inconsistencies there. Although I do not know how they solved it. Probably because they have and use a good bureaucratic system.
Two points:
(1) WP:ISNOT a bureaucracy. :-) I had to get that out there.
I should have seen that one coming. :)
(2) I'm probably more interested in the lower-court system since I'm from the United States and I'm modelling this after the Supremer Court. My main point, however, is that while increasing the number of Arbs may improve the situation, it couldn't improve the situtation any more than a lower court system would also- but the lower court system would have fewer possible drawbacks.
I think lower courts would make it even more like a bureaucracy. Now it's Arb and perhaps an appeal to Jimbo. WIth a lower court it would be one more step. Besides the RFC and other dispute procedures.
Not that I have a perfect solution though. :)
Garion
Ryan _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l