David Carson wrote:
If growth continues, I suspect articles on fiction-related matters will
continue to be ever more dwarfed
Indeed, it seems to me that the hot growth areas currently are football/soccer/association football players, Romanian rivers, and proteins.
I remember a long, long time ago making some wry comments about how it was acceptable to delete something for being "fancruft" but not for being "sportscruft" or "sciencecruft". I wonder if we're headed for a large-scale test of our systemic biases in that regard.
Of late I've been doing a bunch of work adding articles for various geological features on the surface of the planet Mercury. Far from having to battle accusations of cratercruft, I've actually got a half dozen or so front-page "Did You Know" links out of it.