Jon wrote:
Is there any reason why we don’t introduce immediately a rule that says all new information added to an article must be sourced or referenced or the edit will automatically be reverted? And any new articles must be sourced or referenced within two hours, say, of their creation, or will be speedily deleted?
To some extent, that's quietly happening, both reversions of unsourced adds, and edits that include references. I'd just as soon not try to formalize beyond the warning that is now on the edit screen - a sudden deluge of plausible-looking but faked-up sources would be a major problem for RC and watchlist patrol.
Stan