On 5/17/07, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/05/07, Zoney zoney.ie@gmail.com wrote:
I don't wish to be overly cynical, but was it highlighted as much on the mailing list last time around?
What, {{spoiler}}? If you have a look at the old deletion discussion and the current one, the difference I see is that a much better case was made this time for its problematic nature right there on the wiki.
Yes, exactly. I think I was either ambivalent or outright opposed to the proposal last time because the only case made against it was "Not encyclopedic! Hur hur hur!"
Johnleemk