I have an actual situation as follows. Someone has taken an old map (long out of copyright), scanned it onto their computer, and now claims to hold copyright on the scan.
It seems to me this is a bluff. A computer scan should not be any different from a photocopy. There is no artistic input to the result, and in this case the scanner even advertises that the computer file is a precise reproduction of the original.
Am I wrong?
Thanks, Zero.
____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link
$420k for $1,399/mo. Think You Pay Too Much For Your Mortgage? Find Out! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre