On 14/11/2007, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
Actually, as that last link shows, it was an "anonymous website" - did we have a source for it being Bagley at the time? I thought he only admitted it later. And the content mentions that the site existed, so actually the encyclopaedia covered it. Not well, but it covered it.
It was named in reliable sources as his.
Oh, and the "unperson" had a whole article to himself, which is not quite how I understand not *mentioning* the supposed unperson.
Those removing all mention of it were also attempting to get it deleted, and coordinating their activity on a private mailing list.
Plus it was over two months ago, and you appeared to be suggesting that this was still an issue now, which as far as I can tell it is not. Do you have a more recent example?
Two months is recent enough. Stop trying to downplay or minimise this matter of very real concern *that you were in the thick of*.
- d.