Anthony DiPierro wrote:
While we're discussing violation of the 3-revert guideline, let's also discuss violation of the guidelines on use of the rollback button, which is meant for reverting anonymous vandals. I was neither anonymous nor a vandal, yet the first and majority of the reverts of my contribution were made using the rollback button.
It's meant for vandalism of any kind, anonymous or no. And yes, I agree that according to our policies, this situation should not be handled with the rollback button, which is why I brought up the point in the first place.
--Michael Snow