Gutza wrote:
I think banning him would probably prove the point that Wikipedia isn't completely unregulated. But then again, it would probably also prove that we're fascists to such a person. Not banning him would prove him that Wikipedia is unreliable. Talking about him proves that we're a bunch of losers who have nothing better to do. So I think ignoring the guy would probably be the best thing to do, along with keeping an eye on his IP and reverting his changes, should some more occur in the future.
I want to talk to this guy. His opinions of wikipedia aside -- does he really derive amusement from causing damage to something other people have worked hard on? I thought humans grew out of the "kicking sandcastles" phase in late adolescence. Anyway, this is something I'll maybe raise on MeatBall. :)