--- Puddl Duk puddlduk@yahoo.com wrote:
--- Tony 'the [[Energizer Bunny]]' Sidaway minorityreport@bluebottle.com wrote:
Puddl Duk said:
Wikipedia image policy 'suggests' discussing objectionable images before adding. This wasn't
done
for the autofellatio image.
The situation has changed since then; there really has been no successful move to get rid of that picture to date, to my surprise.
I guess I would intemperate this differently; there has been no successful move to _keep_ the image.
And I think the poll is flawed, the link option retains the image at wikipedia. This is wrong.
It seems to me that unless Jimbo ups and deletes it (and you
won't
see any complaints from me if he does), the picture will be there in one form or another for a while. One solution to this might be that Jimbo himself lists it for deletion, because this might shift the stalement that has occurred on IfD each time it has been listed before.
Good points, maybe after the in-line option is defeated the existing policy can be implemented to delete the image. Won't reflect the poll exactly, but the poll is flawed.
I would like to see this policy developed further, getting community consensus before adding objectionable material is good, and doesn't require censorship.
This policy should be applied to speedy deletes; when a troll gets a temporary account to upload his collection of porn, diapers, url stamped vibrator images, etc... and doesn't bother to seek community opinion on the matter, the images could be speeded.
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com