On 05/12/2007, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
every time you click a link it looks in both of them. Maybe we should be considering interwiki links to CZ? The information would still be separate, and we could still distinguish between the models used to create it.
Heh, that's an interesting idea.
By the way, I'm sorry to those who have been waiting, but I hope to announce our license before *too* much longer. The announcement will be accompanied by a very long essay, which I haven't finished yet. Please don't assume the license will be incompatible with Wikipedia's...there's a decent chance it will be compatible.
Ony a chance? Phooey.
Larry has posted to citizendium-l saying that with the WMF/FSF/CC announcement, that a future GFDL will be CC-by-sa compatible, that the Citizendium licence *will not* be GFDL. (Which is IMO quite sensible, 'cos the GFDL sucks for massive-collaboration articles of a few pages, for images, for motion pictures ...)
http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/sharedknowing#more
"Well-reasoned, polite discussion of the nature of online knowledge production communities, with special but not exclusive focus on community policy (production, governance, management) questions; "the new politics of knowledge" broadly speaking." What, is something wrong with wikien-l??
*cough* It's an ideal to work towards.
- d.