stvrtg wrote:
Or instead, we could try to keep up with growth by implementing some more advanced soft controls of our own. The idea of depending on others to develop better content and then hoping they provide their content in an exportable format is... not a good one.
To be honest, if (BIG IF) Citizendium is going to work and produces higher quality stuff at a sufficient fast rate, it will only need a study or two showing that Citizendium is higher quality/more reliable than Wikipedia to flip everything around. If Wikipedia has to rely on Citizendium for better quality GFDL texts than that they can produce themselves, it effectively proves that Wikipedia cannot do what it wants with its current editing paradigm.
Citizendium has one big advantage, they start from scratch with editorial control in place, and will get a different community, while if Wikipedia would like to implement something like that, it has a community that will revolt against that and has to find ways to overcome that.
Kim