On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:36:55 +0100, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
The origin of Schoolwatch was organised querulous mass-AFDs of schools for being schools. Living bios are somewhat more important. And if AFD can't be used to solve the problem, then something else will.
Yup. You'll not find anything like the same polarisation, I think. The Schoolwatch folks hold as an article of faith that all schools are notable. It is far less likely that you would find any meaningful group of editors to assert that all *people* are inherently notable. It is self-evidently absurd. All schools will have a series of articles in the local paper and a few inspection reports online. Schools inclusionists choose to interpret this as multiple non-trivial sources. The same does not apply to all people .
Guy (JzG)