On 24/09/2010 14:21, Fred Bauder wrote:
He says, 'There is some seriously twisted stuff on Wikipedia that has no business in a resource calling itself an "encyclopedia."'
I wonder what that is about?
He also says the money is running out. I wouldn't pay that any mind. As a personal opinion of Sanger's it's fine. As an indictment of Wikipedia's content policies, it's a bit flaky, really. As a comment on the enforcement of the content policies, it might be supported at least anecdotally from stuff on the site. As some sort of bid for someone to support CZ solely as an alternative to WP, it looks a bit desperate. Anyway, Citizendium's future is now in other hands; I've not been impressed with Sanger since the days of editing "Larry's Text" (and that dates me for sure). Which has never undermined my admiration for his pioneer work on WP, but in the perspective (as I have said before) that he apparently misunderstands what was achieved. So this would be more of the same, I think.
Charles