G'day Tony,
On 4/3/06, Garion1000 garion1000@gmail.com wrote:
With this article using the other less offensive image [[Image:Kotori-Kan Vol 2.jpg]] would already be an improvement.
That is still a non-free image. We do have at least two free images that could be used to illustrate that article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Lolicon_comicbooks_sold_in_Japan_001.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Lolicon_comicbooks_sold_in_Japan_002.jpg
I don't get it. What justification did the, ahem, good-faith editors use to argue that we needed fair-use close-ups of kiddie porn instead of the photograph (also, admittedly, of kiddie porn ... but more appropriate and tasteful, if that word can be applied here).
My second question is: how on Earth did this shit ever get to be *legal* in Japan? Some people are *really* sick.