Without precedents editors and the ArbCom are free to make the same mistakes over and over again. How does a reliable source defines that?
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
Of course Wikipedia can't seem to agree with itself on that either.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin#Attributed http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Attributed
nobs
On 2/11/06, charles matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
I made it abundantly clear during the ArbCom elections that I didn't think precedent is a good basis for Arbitrators having their hands tied.