On 5/15/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 11:44:28 +0100, you wrote:
That doens't make them official.
It implies a degree of endorsement.
To who?
I don't see any problem with emphasising the difference between those things which are encouraged as helping the building of an encyclopaedia, from those which are tolerated but recognised as not doing so,
I don't see any reason to do so. I don't see how any of your proposal would do that.
and in some cases actively impeding the process.
Sorry are we talking about AFD, admins, Jimbo, process, IAR, 1-click answers, deletionists, inclusionists, userboxes or methodists here? Some accusions get thrown about so much I generaly ignore them