On 5/2/07, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
On 5/2/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
This is ridiculous. By your reasoning, any admin could delete any article out of process at any time for "legal reasons", regardless of whether Wikipedia's lawyer, or any lawyer, has been consulted.
Well, yeah, they could. And unless there was a good reason to believe that the legal reasons weren't valid, they'd probably get away with it.
I'm surprised there isn't already a CSD for "blatantly illegal material".
Yes, that's what was most frustrating in debating this on DRV. People were going by the letter of the CSD law and not using the gray matter.
-Andrew (User:Fuzheado)