Nothing to do with the fact that Britannica Online has about 100,000 articles and the English Wikipedia (Britannica's direct competitor) has over a million?
Cynical
Mathias Schindler wrote:
Sean Barrett wrote:
"a large portion of wikipedia is pornographic" - Britannica representative (unidentified)
http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2006/03/25/podcast47-in-defense-of-encyclop...
You say that like it's a bad thing....
Hmm, my next press release will contain the following sentence:
"The reason why Encyclopaedia Britannica is failing in the Internet is because a large portion of it is not pornographic."
Mathias _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l