On 17/06/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/17/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 17/06/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/17/07, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
AGF lasts only until proven that it shouldn't.
In my case, of course, it never started, and were is the EVIDENCE that it now "shouldn't".
Your behaviour in perpetually failing to answer a straight question from me with a straight answer.
As opposed to CW's identical behavior?
Which straight questions from me has she not answered?
I am now minded to believe that you will never answer these two questions.
Well, as explained before, I've already answered one of the questions,
I asked you for a link to that, since it wasn't answered in this thread. You didn't answer that, either.
and you're neither a prosecutor nor a judge.
When did I say I was?
There's no particular reason I should answer questions from an obviously hostile questioner who has been applying outrageous double standards in this incident from the very start.
Seriously: I *want* you to tell me that you informed her of her policy violation, and that she continued to violate policy. If you do that, *then* I will support you, and oppose her nomination. But you *haven't*; conspicuously so. If at the start of this, you had simply given me a date when you did so, then you wouldn't have been bombarded with a dozen or more unnecessary emails from me.
If my questioning is hostile, it is because your answers, such as they are, leave a great deal to be desired.
Answer the questions. Please.