On 26/08/06, Stephen Streater sbstreater@mac.com wrote:
Of course, any system can make it hard to introduce revolutionary ideas. All the experts will share the same view, and have made their living and reputation supporting this view. They are unlikely to admit their life's work was based on fallacy, perpetuating the misconceptions.
Sucks to be a tertiary source then.
Admittedly most revolutionary ideas are cranky, but most valuable innovations are revolutionary. It's a balance between ability to fix things and inertia.
I think NPOV is pretty innovative.
- d.