Do you have any evidence to support this claim of a reduction in the trust factor? I only recently (last month or two) began contributing there, and I see people arguing for or against RFAs specifically with the word trust in ever RFA.
On 8/22/07, John Lee johnleemk@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/23/07, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody is currently in the process of standing for adminship on en.wikipedia ... the last three ran their time and were closed earlier today.
I don't recall seeing the page empty the entire time I've been here...
- '''Support'''. We don't need new admins. ~~~~ :p
Maybe now somebody will realise that something is fundamentally wrong with our adminship process. It does not scale; it worked when we were smaller, but now it seems to me that the old indicators of trustworthiness for adminship are unreliable; in the first place, the RfA process seems to diminish the importance of the trust factor, emphasising more the ILIKEIT and IDONTLIKEIT factors.
Johnleemk _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l