On 18/12/2007, Daniel R. Tobias dan@tobias.name wrote:
On 17 Dec 2007 at 14:33:44 +0000, "Andrew Gray" shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
It seems to me to be inevitable that any balanced piece over a page or two in length is going to link to WR (or a similar site), in much the same way as it's guaranteed to have a paragraph or two on Citizendium or Knol or whatever other competitor just got a press release issued.
Is that a "law" of Godwin's variety... as a discussion of Wikipedia gets longer, the probability of a link to WR being introduced approaches one?
The introduction of a mention of it. More importantly, it's as accurate an indicator that the thread is dead and can be ignored.
- d.