It would be really nice if you stopped using the phrase "you wrote" with everything that you quote. I would be more enlightening if you identified the person who really said whatever is quoted. Doing so is certainly the norm for contributors to this list.
Ec
Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:49:39 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
I was wondering if you could review the proposals. If you think that the concerns are valid and that the suggestions made in the proposals has some merit, I would be glad to discuss the issue (not the problems but the possible solutions which I think are reasonable) further. I have a couple of similar suggestions that I believe are critical and can be useful to gently modify the structure of the project and prepare it for the future if it will be expanding in the years to come.
Don't tell me: one of them calls for the removal of images which a small minority of editors find offensive from articles on important events, and another one calls for administrators to be prevented from blocking users who unilaterally remove content they find offensive despite overwhelming consensus to keep it? Am I close?