On 04/03/2008, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, cohesion cohesion@sleepyhead.org wrote:
This one was deleted because it claimed to be fair use, but didn't link to any article. That may seem extreme, but when we are dealing with thousands of images the work really has to rely on the uploader.
Linking to the article has only recently been required. Imposing new rules and then expecting someone who uploaded an image 2 years ago to still be on the site to make that change is rather ludicrous.
Expecting images to fit the new rules, however, isn't.
Surely someone is keeping a general eye on the tagged images, then?
- d.