On 14/07/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 19:11:02 +0100, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Um, no - it's because they pull shit like trashing an RFA because the candidate fails to support their failed policy.
The 'crats should set an example by explicitly ignoring such idiocy. Unless of course the links were actually harassment, in which case it doesn't matter what words we use, they still have to go.
No, I mean SlimVirgin asked Gracenotes if he supported the policy, he said "case by case is best" and she went to town on the RFA. This has been discussed at length on this list already. I'm sure I recall you participating in the thread at the time.
- d.