"Guettarda" wrote
Do you think that a WikiProject Surnames might be in order?
There is certainly enough to do - an essentially unlimited field, you could say.
There are projects and projects. What is most urgently needed is to get under control the most common names on the wiki. There are inevitably 'Anglo': Smith, Jones, Brown, Robinson, lots of Irish and Scots names as found all over Canada and Australia, that kind of thing. Almost the first discussion would have to be what to do about these. For example Smiths are listed under [[List of people by name: Smi]]. We don't really want to start off with a schism between people who think that the [[List of people by name]] pages should be maintained, and those (like me) who think that that is the wrong approach, that writing it "Smith, Adam" is to be deprecated because it confuses search engines, and anyway with biographies into six figures we have to do something other than 1000 pages averaging more than 100 names on.
That's one issue. Another is that WikiProjects can appear much better at prescribing rules to do the work, than at actually doing it.
On the other hand, if there's a chance of getting together people who know their onomastics, with those with theories on how to integrate and present some genealogical information here (for example the boxes turning up on [[Arnold J. Toynbee]] to show the relation to [[Polly Toynbee]]), and others who want to 'add value' to raw lists of names, it could be interesting. I'm pretty much a 'raw list' man myself; but a template for a surname page ought indeed to take into account a bit more.
Charles